NEC Technologies, Inc. v. Nelson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing unconscionability with regard to an exclusion of incidental and consequential damages resulting from use of a television set
• reversing this court’s finding of genuine issues of material fact as to whether one company was the alter ego of another company because there was “an absence of any evidence establishing the existence of fact questions regarding the alter ego issue”
• “[T]o tip the scales in favor of unconscionability, most courts seem to require a certain quantum of procedural plus a certain quantum of substantive unconscionability.”
• “[T]o tip the scales in favor of unconscionability, most courts seem to require a certain quantum of procedural plus a certain quantum of substantive unconscionability.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).