Skip to main content
· 4/28/1995

Nec Home Electronics, Ltd. And Nec Technologies, Inc. v. The United States, and Zenith Electronics Corporation

Citations

  • 54 F.3d 736
  • 17 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1129
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 9753
  • 1995 WL 247700

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that burden imposed to prove a level of trade adjustment was unreasonable because claimant could, under no practical circumstances, meet the burden
  • holding that burden imposed to prove a LOT adjustment was unreasonable because claimant could, under no practical circumstances, meet the burden
  • recognizing Commerce’s practice in the context of pre-URAA statute and regulations
  • ordering Commerce to reopen record to include and consider expert affidavit submitted after publication of preliminary determination and remanding determination
  • “The ITA should consider whether either of these methods of computing a level-of-trade adjustment [offered by respondents] is satisfactory.”
  • imposing impossible burden represents an abuse of ITA’s discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Archer, Lourie, Schall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.