· 4/28/1995
Nec Home Electronics, Ltd. And Nec Technologies, Inc. v. The United States, and Zenith Electronics Corporation
Citations
- 54 F.3d 736
- 17 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1129
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 9753
- 1995 WL 247700
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that burden imposed to prove a level of trade adjustment was unreasonable because claimant could, under no practical circumstances, meet the burden
- holding that burden imposed to prove a LOT adjustment was unreasonable because claimant could, under no practical circumstances, meet the burden
- recognizing Commerce’s practice in the context of pre-URAA statute and regulations
- ordering Commerce to reopen record to include and consider expert affidavit submitted after publication of preliminary determination and remanding determination
- “The ITA should consider whether either of these methods of computing a level-of-trade adjustment [offered by respondents] is satisfactory.”
- imposing impossible burden represents an abuse of ITA’s discretion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Archer, Lourie, Schall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.