Nebroskie v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that even the “uncorroborated testimony of one witness . . . may be sufficient to sustain a conviction”
• noting that even the “uncorroborated testimony of one witness . . . may be sufficient to sustain a conviction”
• noting that even the “uncorroborated testimony of one witness . . . may be sufficient to sustain a conviction”
• explaining that “[t]he jury was not required to accept [the defendant’s] alternative account” and that “we will not second guess [the jury’s] credibility determination” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• assessing sufficiency of the evidence against the elements of the underlying statute, not the conjunctive indictment
• discussing factors relevant to determining if firearm furthered drug trafficking crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).