Skip to main content
· 8/7/2014

Nebraska Machinery Company v. Cargotec Solutions, LLC

Citations

  • 762 F.3d 737
  • 2014 WL 3896179
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 15198

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the court must decide whether the parties intended to submit their dispute to the arbitrator as a threshold matter, regardless of the agreement’s delegation provision
  • remanding for a trial on whether a contract existed when “there were facts left to try”
  • vacating a district court order denying motion to compel arbitration and remanding for a bench trial on factual disputes concerning contract formation where the record on the motion revealed a material issue of fact as to the making of the contract
  • “[U]nder federal practice the technical name attached to a motion or pleading is not as important as its substance.”
  • “if the motions record reveals a material issue of fact, the FAA maintains that the court move summarily to trial”
  • “Given that both parties relied on matters outside the pleadings and sought summary judgment-type rulings, a summary judgment standard—viewing the evidence and resolving all factual disputes in the nonmoving party’s favor—should have been used to evaluate the motions.”’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Beam, Shepherd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.