· 7/1/1871
Nebraska City v. Baker
Citations
- 1 Neb. 180
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding a trial court may not enter a sentence to be served consecutively with additional sentences that are not yet entered
- finding courts may not impose a sentence to be served consecutively with an additional sentence, not yet entered
- reversing a sentencing order that directed a sentence to run consecutively to a sentence that had not yet been imposed
- “When a trial court imposes a sentence and orders it to be served consecutively with any future sentence to be imposed, it appears that such a sentence interferes with the discretion of the second trial judge to fashion an appropriate sentence.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cbounse
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.