Skip to main content
· 10/11/1988

Neasman v. USAA Casualty Insurance

Citations

  • 33 Fla. Supp. 2d 41

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a subsequent action was not barred because the initial court did not have jurisdiction over the claim
  • holding that a subsequent action was not barred because the initial court did not have jurisdiction over the claim
  • holding that a subsequent action was not barred because the initial court did not have jurisdiction over the claim
  • holding that a subsequent action was not barred because the initial court did not have jurisdiction over the claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: County, Stancil

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.