Neary v. Miltronics Manufacturing Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• following Feiwus and also staying claims seeking damages after dismissing dissolution claim on abstention grounds, where, like here, the dissolution claim and the damages claim had both legal and factual commonality
• “Williams provides a compelling—and controlling—reason, independent of the Burford doctrine, for federal courts to abstain from hearing claims for dissolution…against state corporations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).