Neale v. Evans

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting it would be “contrary to general principles of fairness” to allow defendant to duck liability for overtime wages based on an erroneous decision that was reversed.”
• “[t]he Court [] considers the Final Rule effective as of the date the DOL consistently maintained it would be—January 1, 2015”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).