Skip to main content
· 1/15/1998

Neal v. Xerox Corp.

Citations

  • 991 F. Supp. 494
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 533
  • 75 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1758
  • 1998 WL 23990

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiff’s Title VII action, governed by a federal ninety-day limitation, was not saved by the Virginia Savings Statute
  • “Since [plaintiff] brings a federal Title VII action that is governed by a federal 90 day limitations period, Virginia’s non-suit provision does not save her claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clarke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.