· 1/15/1998
Neal v. Xerox Corp.
Citations
- 991 F. Supp. 494
- 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 533
- 75 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1758
- 1998 WL 23990
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that plaintiff’s Title VII action, governed by a federal ninety-day limitation, was not saved by the Virginia Savings Statute
- “Since [plaintiff] brings a federal Title VII action that is governed by a federal 90 day limitations period, Virginia’s non-suit provision does not save her claim.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clarke
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.