Neal v. State ex rel. King

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the assertion that a sentencing court improperly considered nolle prossed charges constitutes a discretionary sentence claim
• holding that the assertion that a sentencing court improperly considered nolle prossed charges constitutes a discretionary sentence claim
• holding that a claim that the sentencing court failed to impose a RRRI minimum implicates the legality of sentence
• recognizing that a claim based upon the failure to give credit for time served as a challenge to the legality of a sentence
• holding that a challenge to a court’s failure to impose an RRRI sentence implicates the legality of the sentence and cannot be waived
• holding that the claim that the sentencing court improperly considered nolle prossed charges was a challenge to the discretionary aspects of sentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).