Skip to main content

Neal v. State

Citations

  • 628 P.2d 19
  • 1981 Alas. LEXIS 480

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dispensing with specific fact findings under similar circumstances where established recidivism indicated defendant’s propensity for future criminal conduct
  • dispensing with specific fact findings under similar circumstances where established recidivism indicated defendant's propensity for future criminal conduct
  • dispensing with the requirement of specific fact-findings under circum stances where record indicates defendant’s propensity for future criminal conduct
  • dispensing with the requirement of specific fact-findings under circumstances where record indicates defendant's propensity for future criminal conduct
  • the lack of an express finding of necessity to impose a consecutive sentence to protect the public may be inferred from the record
  • appellate court may infer a Mutschler finding from the record when the record clearly establishes the court’s reasons for imposing the sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rabinowitz, Con-Nor, Burke, Matthews, Dimond

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.