Neal v. Spooner
Citations
- 20 Fla. 38
Syllabus
<p>1. Under the plea of not guilty in ejectment special pleas under the statute of limitations should be struck out. Evidence to prove adverse possession, 'or an adverse title, may be given under the general issue.</p> <p>2. The record of a deed is not proper evidence, if objected to, without proof of an original duly executed. The original is not¿w se evidence, but its execution must be proved by evidence other than the certificate of proof or acknowledgment for record.</p> <p>3. A tax deed, purporting on its face to have been executed within five days after the sale by the collector, is void.</p> <p>4. At the trial and before a cause is submitted to the jury, the proceedings may be amended by striking out the name of a plaintiff, and also by inserting the name of a next friend of a plaintiff who is shown to be a minor, under the sixth section of the Practice Act of 1861.</p> <p>5. The oifiission of a next friend to give a bond to secure the proceeds of a judgment to be recovered cannot be assigned as error by the defendant on appeal. He is not injured or prejudiced, and it does not concern him.</p> <p>6. A judgment in ejectment in favor of the plaintiff should state the quantity of the estate recovered. This is required by the statute of 1881; and a judgment which does not show what estate is recovered and to be delivered must be set aside and a proper judgment entered by the court, conformable to the vei-dict.</p>
Cited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hoodless v. JerniganSupreme Court of Florida· 1903-06-15· cited 82×
- Coffee v. GrooverSupreme Court· 1887-10-17· cited 47×
- Buesing v. ForbesSupreme Court of Florida· 1894-01-15· cited 17×
- State ex rel. Sanchez v. CallSupreme Court of Florida· 1895-06-15· cited 15×
- Gibbs v. McCoySupreme Court of Florida· 1915-11-02· cited 15×
- Osceola Fertilizer Co. v. BevilleSupreme Court of Florida· 1923-11-22· cited 13×
- Smith v. WestcottSupreme Court of Florida· 1894-06-15· cited 12×
- Hamburg v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida· 1900-01-15· cited 10×
- Hall v. Louisville & N. R. Co.United States Circuit Court for the Northern District of Florida· 1907-11-23· cited 7×
- Burke v. O'BRIENSupreme Court of Florida· 1950-09-12· cited 6×
- Baker v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court· 1905-12-30· cited 3×
- Liebling v. Barbara Building & Development Corp.S.D. Florida· 1931-08-07· cited 1×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.