Neal v. Meek

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• any required lump-sum payment must be supported by findings of fact demonstrating the payor spouse’s ability to make the payment within the contemplated timeframe
• “[A]ny requirement of payment of a lump sum within a time certain . . . must be supported by findings of fact demonstrating that [the father] would have the ability to pay within the time frame contemplated by the order.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).