· 6/11/2003
Neal v. General Motors Corp.
Citations
- 266 F. Supp. 2d 449
- 30 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2158
- 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9944
- 2003 WL 21356735
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he statutory policies supporting ERISA favor finding that Defendant's federal common law unjust enrichment claim arises under ERISA.”
- “[A]n unjust enrichment action [may be] an appropriate remedy in circumstances regarding incorrect payment under an employee benefit plan.” (emphasis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mullen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.