Skip to main content

Neal v. Baker

Citations

  • 551 N.E.2d 704
  • 194 Ill. App. 3d 485
  • 141 Ill. Dec. 517
  • 1990 Ill. App. LEXIS 235

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • primary purpose of attorney-client relationship was to assist executor in the proper administration of its duties; no duty to beneficiaries
  • beneficiary of testamentary trust not third-party beneficiary absent clear indication that representation of executor’s, attorney was intended directly to confer benefit on her
  • an obstacle with extending attorney liability in probate situations is that the personal representative and the estate beneficiaries are often adversaries
  • “A nonclient must prove that the primary purpose and intent of the attorney-client relationship is to benefit or influence the third party.”
  • adversarial relationship resulted between attorney for the estate and income beneficiary where beneficiary contested attorney’s contention that she, rather than the estate, should pay inheritance tax
  • adversarial relationship resulted between attorney for the estate and income beneficiary where beneficiary contested attorney's contention that she, rather than the estate, should pay inheritance tax

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chapman, Lewis, Harrison

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.