Neal Kirkpatrick v. Leander J. Shaw, Jr., John H. Moore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Florida state bar’s character and fitness requirement for attorneys did not violate Dormant Commerce Clause
• district court correctly determined that it had subject matter jurisdiction only over plaintiffs facial challenge to the constitutionality of Florida’s general rules and procedures governing admission to bar, not over his challenge to Board’s denial of his application

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).