· 7/5/1989
Neal & Co. v. United States
Citations
- 17 Cl. Ct. 511
- 35 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,683
- 1989 U.S. Claims LEXIS 127
- 1989 WL 73115
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying abuse of discretion standard to district court’s grant of motion to strike
- “We review a district court’s decision to grant a motion to strike unscheduled supplementary material for abuse of discre- tion.”
- “[A]ll claims of unjust taking ha[ve] to be brought pursuant to Section 1983 . . . .”
- “[A]ll claims of unjust taking ha[ve] to be brought pursuant to Section 1983 . . . .”
- “As a general rule, ‘a federal appellate court does not consider an issue not passed upon below.’” (quoting Singleton v. Wulff, 428 U.S. 106, 120 (1976))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nettesheim
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.