Skip to main content
· 7/5/1989

Neal & Co. v. United States

Citations

  • 17 Cl. Ct. 511
  • 35 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,683
  • 1989 U.S. Claims LEXIS 127
  • 1989 WL 73115

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying abuse of discretion standard to district court’s grant of motion to strike
  • “We review a district court’s decision to grant a motion to strike unscheduled supplementary material for abuse of discre- tion.”
  • “[A]ll claims of unjust taking ha[ve] to be brought pursuant to Section 1983 . . . .”
  • “[A]ll claims of unjust taking ha[ve] to be brought pursuant to Section 1983 . . . .”
  • “As a general rule, ‘a federal appellate court does not consider an issue not passed upon below.’” (quoting Singleton v. Wulff, 428 U.S. 106, 120 (1976))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nettesheim

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.