Neal Bross v. Department of Commerce

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the agency did not commit harmful error when it replaced the original proposing official because he “had not yet reached a decision as to the appropriate penalty” when he was removed from this role
• assessing whether substitution of proposing official violated employee’s rights under labor agreement that pro- vided “Division Chiefs or their equivalents will normally serve as both Proposing and Deciding Official”
• “The statute [chapter 75 of Title 5] and the Office of Personnel Management regulations do not designate which level of agency official should make a decision on an adverse action proposal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).