Ndrecaj v. Mukasey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that an inconsistency goes to the heart of an applicant’s claim if it can be viewed as enhancing the claim
• finding no due process violation where there was “no evidence that [the IJ] did not fairly consider the [applicants’] evidence”
• affirming denial of asylum of petitioner, who was a former member of Democratic Party in Albania, because political developments in the country marked a fundamental change in circumstances
• finding no due process violation in part because “[t]he IJ gave a detailed description of all of the inconsistencies that he identified and then explained how those inconsistencies supported his finding ... ”
• an immigration judge’s statement that “the respondent has not demonstrated to be a credible person” constituted an adverse credibility determination
• “[0]n the basis of published reports of Albania’s political development, we have previously stated that the conditions in Albania are ‘fundamentally changed.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).