NCDR, L.L.C. v. Mauze & Bagby, P.L.L.C., et

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court’s TCPA ruling was appealable under federal collateral order doctrine, meeting doctrinal requirements that it (1) conclusively determined disputed, question, (2) resolved important issue completely separate from action’s merits, and (3
• noting that nature of TCPA is akin to conferring immunity from suit where shown to apply
• recognizing 41 that California statute is similar to, but not identical, to TCPA
• deeming waived party’s argument that Texas’ anti-SLAPP statute conflicts with the certain federal Rules
• blindly following Batzel 's dicta and, absent critical analysis, construing Texas' anti-SLAPP statute as a grant of immunity
• arguments that TCPA conflicts with FRCP 12(d) and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4 waived because not raised in district court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).