· 4/19/1991
Nazay v. Miller
Citations
- 768 F. Supp. 124
- 14 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1108
- 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9032
- 1991 WL 144104
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that where a petitioner has already used his or her direct appeal, \collateral review of . . . record-based claims is also foreclosed.\
- “[A] claim of ineffective assistance of counsel must contain specific factual contentions regarding how counsel was ineffective.”
- \It is well-settled in this Circuit that section 440.10(2)(b) can provide an adequate and independent state law ground on which to deny habeas relief.\
- \It is well established that this preservation rule is a firmly established and regularly followed state practice that bars subsequent habeas review.\
- “It is well established that this preservation rule is a firmly established and regularly followed state practice that bars subsequent habeas review.”
- “It is well-settled in this Circuit that vague and conclusory allegations that are unsupported by specific factual averments are insufficient to state a viable claim for habeas relief.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Caldwell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.