Skip to main content
· 4/19/1991

Nazay v. Miller

Citations

  • 768 F. Supp. 124
  • 14 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1108
  • 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9032
  • 1991 WL 144104

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that where a petitioner has already used his or her direct appeal, \collateral review of . . . record-based claims is also foreclosed.\
  • “[A] claim of ineffective assistance of counsel must contain specific factual contentions regarding how counsel was ineffective.”
  • \It is well-settled in this Circuit that section 440.10(2)(b) can provide an adequate and independent state law ground on which to deny habeas relief.\
  • \It is well established that this preservation rule is a firmly established and regularly followed state practice that bars subsequent habeas review.\
  • “It is well established that this preservation rule is a firmly established and regularly followed state practice that bars subsequent habeas review.”
  • “It is well-settled in this Circuit that vague and conclusory allegations that are unsupported by specific factual averments are insufficient to state a viable claim for habeas relief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Caldwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.