Nazario BARELA, Plaintiff-Appellee (Cross-Appellant), v. UNITED NUCLEAR CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant (Cross-Appellee)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming award of $25 per hour as within trial court discretion
• apparently accepting business necessity as an appropriate defense in principle, but holding that it had not been established
• state agency that returned case to EEOC without processing it, citing heavy workload, had been afforded requisite opportunity
• apparently accepting business necessity as an appropriate defense in principle, but holding that it had not been established

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).