Nayokpuk v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that to be proper, an ex parte application must demonstrate that there is good cause to allow the moving party to “go to the head of the line in front of all other litigants and receive special treatment”
• stating that to be proper, an ex parte application must demonstrate that there is good cause to allow the moving party to “go to the head of the line in front of all other litigants and receive special treatment”
• denying ex parte motion as plaintiff delayed in requesting relief, therefore 7 || causing the crisis that necessitated the ex parte relief
• explaining under heading “What does a proper ex parte motion consist of?” that ex parte application contains two distinct 26 motions, (1) a motion addressing only why the regular noticed motion procedures must be bypassed, and (2
• “A showing of irreparable prejudice usually 15 requires reference to the merits of the underlying motion.”
• ex parte relief only justified on a showing (1) “that the moving party’s cause will be irreparably prejudiced if the underlying motion is heard according to regular noticed motion procedures,” and (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).