Naylon v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that petitioner’s affidavit and articles are “too speculative to be credited as a basis for fear of future persecution”
• holding that petitioner’s “affidavit and articles are ‘too speculative to be credited as a basis for fear of future persecution’” (quoting Nagoulko, 333 F.3d at 1018)
• concluding that evidence of changed country conditions is not material where the noncitizen “failed to show that those conditions more severely impact him and his family than the population at large”
• rejecting “speculative” statements as the basis for future persecution (quoting Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012, 1018 (9th Cir. 2003))
• “Courts also have used their inherent power to manage their docket to administratively close cases. . . .”
• “[A]n applicant who is unable to show a reasonable possibility of future persecution necessarily fails to satisfy the more stringent standard . . . for withholding of removal.” (simplified)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).