Skip to main content
· 5/28/2009

Nayal v. HIP Network Services IPA, Inc.

Citations

  • 620 F. Supp. 2d 566
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50203
  • 2009 WL 1560187

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no procedural unconscionability where the plaintiff, inter alia, did not allege that “she was not permitted to review the Agreement with an attorney”
  • “Courts applying New York law ,.. have uniformly held that class action waivers are not unconscionable.”
  • “Courts applying New York law . . . have uniformly held that class action waivers are not unconscionable.”
  • in turn quoting Gillman v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., 534 N.E.2d 824, 828 (N.Y. 1988)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Victor Marrero

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.