Navistar International Transportation Corporation v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reiterating that RACT must be, “the lowest emission limitation that a particular source is capable of meeting . . .”
• reiterating that RACT must be, “the lowest emission limitation that a particular source is capable of meeting . . .”
• “[A]ny alleged prejudice on the part of the decisionmaker must be evident from the record and cannot be based on speculation or inference.”
• “[T]he final, reviewable agency action was taken on Navistar’s proposed SIP revision when the acting regional administrator signed the final rulemaking document [which was published in the Federal Register].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).