Skip to main content
· 8/8/1996

NAVCOM DEFENSE ELECTRONICS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BALL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant

Citations

  • 92 F.3d 877
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 9681
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5891
  • 41 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,975
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 19897
  • 1996 WL 445329

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “[a] subcontractor may assert a claim against the government only by having the prime contractor ‘sponsor’ and certify the subcontractor’s claim”
  • rejecting argument that subcontractor’s claim against prime contractor should have been submitted to a contracting officer under the CDA, reasoning in part that subcontractor’s claim was not against the government

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Browning, Wallace, Farris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.