Navarro-Montes v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an autistic child faced a grave risk of harm if he were returned to Italy because there were no adequate treatment facilities there
• holding that the Hague Convention does not permit denial of return of children petitions without prejudice
• concluding that it was not error for the district court to decline to separate the children but also finding that both children faced a grave risk of harm from abuse if returned
• concluding that the district court’s “findings evince a ‘propensity’ for violence”
• explaining that a “grave risk of harm exists when repatriation would make the child face a real risk of being hurt, physically or psychologically” (cleaned up)
• noting spousal abuse can establish a grave risk of harm to the child in certs in circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).