Navajo Tribe v. National Labor Relations Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Sierra Club was entitled to injunctive relief if the agency violated substantive or procedural provisions of the ESA
• deferring to the Service as “the agency with the more appropriate expertise”
• Sierra Club is \entitled to relief if the [defendants] violated a substantive or procedural provision of the ESA.\
• “The effects of unrelated private or state activities that are reasonably certain to occur are ‘cumulative effects.’ ”
• risk that mitigation may not succeed “must be borne by the project, not by the endangered species”
• ESA does not permit court to consider hardship an injunction may impose on project if endangered species’ habitat is likely to be destroyed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).