Nava v. Franklin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Eighth Amendment erects no per se bar against the admission of victim impact evidence and prosecutorial argument
• holding that the Eighth Amendment erects no per se bar against the admission of victim impact evidence and prosecutorial argument
• holding that the Eighth Amendment erects no per se bar against the admission of victim impact evidence and prosecutorial argument
• holding that the Eighth Amendment erects no per se bar against the admission of victim impact evidence and prosecutorial argument
• recognizing that the prosecution has a legitimate interest in adducing proof that \`the victim is an individual whose death represents a unique loss to society'\
• holding that the Eight Amendment erects no per se bar against the admission of victim impact evidence and prosecutorial argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).