Nautilus Insurance v. I.L.S. General Contractors, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• splitting eligibility for punitive damages and amount of punitive damages to be awarded into first and second phases respectively
• “In 14 Intervenors also “reiterate that [the Phase I Findings] remain subject to revision under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b
• “Courts that have considered whether punitive damages should be addressed during Phase I or Phase II have taken different approaches.” (describing approaches)
• “In considering Rule 12(b)(6) motions, courts must look within the four corners of the complaint, accept all well-pleaded factual allegations as true, and determine if the plaintiff is plausibly entitled to relief.”
• “In considering Rule 12(b)(6) motions, courts must look within the four corners of the complaint, accept all well-pleaded factual allegations as true, and determine if the plaintiff is plausibly entitled to relief.”
• for purposes of Teamsters pattern-or-practice claims, retaliation is treated as disparate treatment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).