Naudain v. Naudain

Citations

• 24 Del. 594
• 1 Boyce 594
• 76 A. 225
• 1910 Del. LEXIS 60

Syllabus

<p>Divorce—Evidence of Desertion; Insufficiency—Evidence of Adult- 1 cry; Insufficiency. ' Í</p> <p>1. Where it appears that the parties, in an action for divorce, have I not lived together possibly for a period exceeding two years, yet they were ( in frequent touch with each other, and their conduct towards each other is V not convincing that the defendant at any time intended to desert his wife, J the plaintiff, a divorce, on the ground of desertion, will be refused. J</p> <p>2. Where the evidence in an action for divorce only shows a friendly \\ relation existing between the defendant husband and another woman, Í and nothing is shown that has even a suspicion of improper relations \\ between them, a divorce, on the ground of adultery, will be refused.</p>