· 7/22/2004
Nau v. Department of Revenue
Citations
- 337 Or. 216
- 94 P.3d 118
- 2004 Ore. LEXIS 483
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[W]e are free to affirm . . . on any basis supported by the record.”
- “We must therefore address the jurisdictional [Eleventh Amendment] question that clearly exists, even though it was not addressed by the court below.”
- “[W]e are free to affirm the judgment on any basis supported by the record.”
- “[S]tate immunity is jurisdictional in the same sense as the complete diversity requirement or the well-pleaded complaint rule. . . .[A] federal court must examine each claim in a case to see if the court's jurisdiction is barred by the Eleventh Amendment”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Breithaupt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.