Skip to main content
· 7/22/2004

Nau v. Department of Revenue

Citations

  • 337 Or. 216
  • 94 P.3d 118
  • 2004 Ore. LEXIS 483

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]e are free to affirm . . . on any basis supported by the record.”
  • “We must therefore address the jurisdictional [Eleventh Amendment] question that clearly exists, even though it was not addressed by the court below.”
  • “[W]e are free to affirm the judgment on any basis supported by the record.”
  • “[S]tate immunity is jurisdictional in the same sense as the complete diversity requirement or the well-pleaded complaint rule. . . .[A] federal court must examine each claim in a case to see if the court's jurisdiction is barred by the Eleventh Amendment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Breithaupt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.