Skip to main content
· 8/8/2013

Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. County of Los Angeles

Citations

  • 725 F.3d 1194
  • 43 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20180
  • 2013 WL 4017155
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 16416

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that language is ambiguous “if reasonable people could find its terms susceptible to more than one interpretation”
  • holding that an NPDES permit must include compliance monitoring measures
  • holding that an NPDES permit must include compliance monitoring measures
  • highlighting that the plain language of a NPDES permit authorizes citizens to enforce all permit conditions
  • “[A] permittee violates the CWA when it .discharges pollutants in excess of the levels specified in the permit, or where the permittee otherwise violates the permit’s terms.”
  • “County Defendants do not dispute 21 that they are discharging pollutants from the [ ] MS4 into these 22 rivers.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pregerson, Smith, Holland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.