Skip to main content
· 7/8/1976

Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Arcata National Corp.

Citations

  • 59 Cal. App. 3d 959
  • 131 Cal. Rptr. 172
  • 6 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20623
  • 10 ERC (BNA) 1224
  • 1976 Cal. App. LEXIS 1688

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We entertain no doubt that the two acts in question are not in conflict, but rather supplement each other and, therefore, must be harmonized.”
  • CEQA supplements Forest Practice Act
  • CEQA supplements Forest Practice Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kane

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.