Skip to main content
· 4/16/2014

Natural Resources Defense Coun v. Kenneth Salazar

Citations

  • 749 F.3d 776
  • 44 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20089
  • 2014 WL 1465695
  • 78 ERC (BNA) 1517
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 7063

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a similar shortage provision in the DMC Contracts “is permissive, and merely absolves the United States of liability if there is a water shortage resulting from, inter alia, ‘actions taken . . . to meet legal obligations.’”
  • “The agency lacks discretion only if another legal obligation makes it impossible for the agency to exercise discretion for the protected species’ benefit.”
  • We refer to the Delta-Mendota Canal water supply contracts as the “DMC Contracts,” and the contractors as the “DMC Contractors.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kozinski, McKeown, Wardlaw, Fisher, Gould, Tallman, Rawlinson, Clifton, Callahan, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.