Skip to main content
· 9/18/1997

Natural Gas Odorizing, Inc. v. Downs

Citations

  • 685 N.E.2d 155
  • 1997 Ind. App. LEXIS 1270
  • 1997 WL 583675

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • refusing to apply sophisticated intermediary doctrine as a matter of law where manufacturer failed to give specific warning about risk that caused injuries that prompted suit
  • “Whether a manufacturer has discharged its duty under the sophisticated intermediary doctrine is almost always a question for the trier of fact.”
  • “Whether a manufacturer has discharged its duty under the sophisticated intermediary doctrine is almost always a question for the trier of fact.”
  • “Whether a manufacturer has discharged its duty under the sophisticated intermediary doctrine is almost always a question for the trier of fact.”
  • “[A] la‐ tent danger will, without more, cause the product to be un‐ reasonably dangerous as marketed.”
  • “[A] la‐ tent danger will, without more, cause the product to be un‐ reasonably dangerous as marketed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Najam, Robertson, Riley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.