Skip to main content
· 9/13/1961

Natoli v. Deal

Citations

  • 196 F. Supp. 927
  • 1961 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2772

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • awarding costs arising from “the discovery necessary to identify alternative sources of information or from the investigation and litigation of the document destruction itself’
  • duty to preserve evidence arose when defendants held a meeting to discuss the underlying incident because the meeting indicated that the university defendants were aware of the plaintiff's sexual misconduct allegations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kraft

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.