· 9/13/1961
Natoli v. Deal
Citations
- 196 F. Supp. 927
- 1961 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2772
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- awarding costs arising from “the discovery necessary to identify alternative sources of information or from the investigation and litigation of the document destruction itself’
- duty to preserve evidence arose when defendants held a meeting to discuss the underlying incident because the meeting indicated that the university defendants were aware of the plaintiff's sexual misconduct allegations
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kraft
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.