Skip to main content
· 3/16/1911

Natlee Draft Horse Co. v. Cripe & Co.

Citations

  • 142 Ky. 810
  • 135 S.W. 292
  • 1911 Ky. LEXIS 293

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]ithout any facts showing that [plaintiff] engaged in activity outside of his normal job responsibilities, [defendant] could not have been on notice that he was engaged in protected activity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nunn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.