Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Richardson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that because the clause at issue “potentially affect[ed] the insurance coverage of most businesses in the District of Columbia,” the question was “one of significant import to the public”
• explaining that because the clause at issue “potentially affect[ed] the insur- ance coverage of most businesses in the District of Columbia,” the question was “one of significant import to the public”
• “The burden is on the insurer to spell out in terms understandable to the man in the street any provisions that would exclude coverage.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• \[c]ourts across the nation are hopelessly divided\
• conflicts analysis for contract cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).