Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Filos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that an insurer may “be estopped from denying coverage, notwithstanding that coverage for the risk did not in fact exist”
• noting that an insurer may “be estopped from denying coverage, notwithstanding that coverage for the risk did not in fact exist”
• “Illinois courts have followed the general rule that the doctrine of estoppel cannot be used to create primary liability or to increase coverage provided under an insurance policy.”
• \Illinois courts have followed the general rule that the doctrine of estoppel cannot be used to create primary liability or to increase coverage provided under an insurance policy.\
• “Illinois courts have followed the general rule that the doctrine of estoppel cannot be used to create primary liability or to increase coverage provided under an insurance policy.”
• “Illinois courts have followed the general rule that the doctrine of estoppel cannot be used to create primary liability or to increase coverage provided under an insurance policy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).