Skip to main content
· 10/25/1995

Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Olah

Citations

  • 662 So. 2d 980
  • 1995 WL 621559

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing an award of UM benefits because the policy contained a valid exclusion limiting UM benefits to a vehicle not covered under the liability section of the policy
  • “When construing an insurance policy to determine coverage the pertinent provisions should be read in pari materia.” (emphasis added)
  • “[w]hen construing an insurance policy to determine coverage the pertinent provisions should be read in pari materia.”
  • “When construing an insurance policy to determine coverage the pertinent provisions should be read in pari materia.”
  • “When construing an insurance policy to determine 19 coverage the pertinent provisions should be read in pari materia.”
  • “When construing an insurance policy to determine coverage the pertinent provisions should be read in pari materia.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Quince

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.