Nationwide Insurance v. Horace Mann Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \excess coverage is not considered collectible insurance for purposes of the underlying coverage\
• holding that one policy's coverage is excess and another policy's coverage is primary and not excess when interpretation of the \other coverage\ clauses is not ambiguous and the clauses do not conflict
• noting the distinctive application of the pro rata and excess provisions applicable to owned and- non-owned vehicles
• finding the intent of parties to be discerned from the plain language of the contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).