Skip to main content
· 12/7/1989

Nationwide General Insurance v. Government Employees Insurance

Citations

  • 566 A.2d 1117
  • 81 Md. App. 104
  • 1989 Md. App. LEXIS 206

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • The Court of Special Appeals held that coverage extended to the second permittee because “the first permit-tee[] was in the car with [the second permittee] and was benefitted by its operation.”
  • using car under policy included “be[ing] a passenger in it”
  • using car under policy included \be[ing] a passenger in it\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.