National Wrecking Company v. St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reiterating that the substantial evidence standard of review 12 is highly deferential
• “delay in notification,” on its own, “is not a cognizable injury” that 12 confers Article III standing on a plaintiff
• the ALJ properly recognized that daily activities “did not 12 suggest Valentine could return to his old job[,]” but “did suggest that [his] later claims 13 about the severity of his limitations were exaggerated”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).