National Wildlife Federation v. Donald P. Hodel, Secretary of the Interior

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that injury to “traditional economic interests [] will support a claim of standing”
• recognizing that a plaintiff “need not show to a certainty” that relief will redress the injury
• holding that Secretary of the Interior’s failure to re- promulgate national mining regulations remanded to him by the District Court rendered challenge to those particular regulations moot
• “[sjome-thing that is due to a person by just claim, legal guarantee, or moral principle”
• observing that the injury-in-fact requirement “is the core of standing” (citing Daughtrey v. Carter, 584 F.2d 1050, 1056 (D.C. Cir. 1978))
• refusing to find the Secretary of the Interior’s withdrawal of a challenged regulation to be an exception to mootness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).