Skip to main content
· 6/26/1984

National Union Fire Insurance v. Reno's Executive Air, Inc.

Citations

  • 682 P.2d 1380
  • 100 Nev. 360
  • 1984 Nev. LEXIS 391

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • directing that the Court must read the contract to give effect to all 16 || of its provisions
  • holding that ambiguities “must be construed against the insurer.”
  • noting that ambiguous insurance policy provisions are interpreted in favor of coverage
  • “A court must look to the entire contract of insurance for a true understanding of what risks are assumed by the insurer and what risks are excluded.”
  • “A court must look to the entire contract of insurance for a true understanding of what risks are assumed by the insurer and what risks are excluded.”
  • “Clauses providing coverage are 19 broadly interpreted so as to afford the greatest possible coverage to the insured, [and] clauses 20 excluding coverage are interpreted narrowly against the insurer.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.