· 6/26/1984
National Union Fire Insurance v. Reno's Executive Air, Inc.
Citations
- 682 P.2d 1380
- 100 Nev. 360
- 1984 Nev. LEXIS 391
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- directing that the Court must read the contract to give effect to all 16 || of its provisions
- holding that ambiguities “must be construed against the insurer.”
- noting that ambiguous insurance policy provisions are interpreted in favor of coverage
- “A court must look to the entire contract of insurance for a true understanding of what risks are assumed by the insurer and what risks are excluded.”
- “A court must look to the entire contract of insurance for a true understanding of what risks are assumed by the insurer and what risks are excluded.”
- “Clauses providing coverage are 19 broadly interpreted so as to afford the greatest possible coverage to the insured, [and] clauses 20 excluding coverage are interpreted narrowly against the insurer.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.