National Union Fire Insurance v. Olson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that UM coverage applied to an employee who was not physically occupying the insured vehicle
• holding that a UM policy cannot restrict coverage to persons “occupying” a covered vehicle because HRS § 431-448 requires that UM insurance cover “the ownership, maintenance, or use of the vehicle”
• holding ambulance driver’s lighting of flare at scene of accident to guide traffic was covered
• coverage provided for emergency medical technician who was struck by uninsured motorist while placing flares to warn of accident scene

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).