National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. The Stroh Companies, Inc. And the Stroh Brewery Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that arguments raised for the first time on a motion for reconsideration may be rejected as untimely
• holding 15 that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion for additional discovery 16 where the moving party merely speculated about what could be discovered
• noting that party moving for reconsideration, “may not advance new facts, issues, or arguments not previously presented to the Court” (quoting Polsby v. St. Martin’s Press, No. 97 Civ. 690(MBM), 2000 WL 98057, at (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 18, 2000))
• noting that party moving for reconsideration, “may not advance new facts, issues, or arguments not previously presented to the Court” (quoting Polsby v. St. Martin’s Press, No. 97 Civ. 690(MBM), 2000 WL 98057, at (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 18, 2000))
• affirming the rejection of a party’s argument raised for the first time in support of a motion for reconsideration
• affirming rejection of argument raised for the first time on a motion for reconsideration as untimely (collecting cases)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).