National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA. v. Kozeny

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding “it [was] not unfair to require [defendant] to litigate [the] dispute in” London because defendant “reside[d] in London for two months each year”
• identifying claims for unjust enrichment and constructive trust asserted against all defendants
• issuing stay in federal suit filed two months after foreign suit
• less access to discovery and unavailability of jury trial in foreign court weighs against stay
• stay deciding the case because of the similarity of the two actions, promotion of judicial efficiency, adequacy of relief available, and timing of the filings.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).